Jump to content

Talk:Salem witch trials

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleSalem witch trials was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 12, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
January 21, 2008Good article nomineeListed
December 16, 2010Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 1, 2004, September 19, 2004, September 19, 2005, September 19, 2006, September 19, 2007, March 1, 2011, and March 1, 2016.
Current status: Delisted good article


This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2022 and 6 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hdgoble (article contribs).

Semi-protected edit request on 15 November 2024

[edit]

Please change in the "Accusations" section, "...and the witches accused of having caused physical and mental harm..." to "...and the women accused of having caused physical and mental harm...". Paytonelsey (talk) 22:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Salem witch trials only occurred for one year and within this year the hunt was a global phenomenon, a phenomenon that swayed men to listen to women and put other women to death in a time when women were seen and not heard.

[edit]

A compilation of resources and discoveries that wonder why this year? Why suddenly, moreover, why the hunt and trials suddenly stopped.

Not only did these trials stop and the remainder of the "witches" released, but apologies were given publicly from the most influential. ItsMe Andree (talk) 07:49, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

During the century that the year of the Salem Witch-hunt and Witch trials occurred, women were to be seen and not heard. So, why did men choose to listen too, judge, sentence, carry out sentencing, (most which included death) based upon the words of women, when they felt women were the lesser and scoffed at the idea that women could be educated or knowledgeable?
SOURCE 1: “A Storm Of WitchCraft”-
This source begins with contradictions. Though history tells us that it was very young female Puritans from Salem that started the hunt, it was actually a 40-year-old quaker woman that had just moved to Salem from Nantucket named, Bathsheba Pope. Also, unlike the other accusations, her husband had equal testimony that he added in “addition” to his wife’s testimony.
Continued: Bathsheba is the aunt of Benjamin Franklin. In one generation, this family goes from “victims of witchcraft”, to producing one of the leaders of American “Enlightenment”. I feel that these “Quakers”, moved to a town and deemed to take power over it with accomplishment.
SOURCE 2: National Geographic, “The History of Witchcraft”.
NONE of the accused that confessed of witchcraft were executed during the Salem witch trials.
This is the one source I found reasonable and here is why:
Historians believe that a small pox epidemic, the arrival of people displaced by war between England and France in American Colonies, ongoing conflicts with the area’s indigenous people, and border disputes between colonial neighbors”, were reasons people became hysterical about witches and witchcraft. These were the reason’s people were tortured to death. After looking onto those that gave these reasons I found that they were all men.
SOURCE 3: “Witchcraft, Magic, Religion, in 17th-century Massachusetts”
As abruptly as the accusations began, they ended. Before the Salem Witchcraft Trials there were no accusations. To be clearer, the accusations were considered “inactive” on American soil. This is because witchcraft accusations had ended when the colonist came to America from England, and until 1662 there were no accusations on record. Historically the trials were “out of place”, because of the conflict of beliefs and interest, with the lack of covenant theology. Basically, the Puritans didn’t have enough knowledge to claim witchcraft except for the “Old Laws” that came over from England. They didn’t even know if they should try the cases in a church or courthouse.
According to this source, the Witch Trials started with 9 year old Betty Parris and 11 year old Abigail Williams accusing one of Betty’s family slaves. I contend that these homes usually were one large room, a kitchen and maybe an extra bedroom. These girls started “throwing things, making strange sounds, screaming, and contorting their bodies”. 12 year old Ann Putnam started do the same odd things.
In the North, men were known to rape their slaves. Psychologically this could create a questionable sexual identity. If this was an unknown “known”, then the power their father had would correlate with my thesis.
PRIMARY SOURCE: “Deposition of Anne Putman and her 12 year old daughter”. The letter of accusation to the apology letter says so much for the mental state of these women.
THESIS: When given the chance, the quintessential identity of male and female is tossed aside when the idiom of extreme power is given in an abhorrent measure to men. With fabricated, fictious and gossip knowledge given by women, the men ignored law, and their own biblical warning, (“Thow shall not judge lest ye be judged”). With emphasis on what women were saying and holy vernacular taken out of context, the year of the “Salem Witch trials” depicts a serious lapse of judgement, (ironically), brought by the desire for power and grandeur. Additionally, afterwards, no one had to answer for the atrocities placed upon innocent people. Thus, the reasoning of the hunt dissipated and lasted only a year, 1692-1693. However, the sorry, sorrow, and coverup continuing even now. ItsMe Andree (talk) 07:51, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]